Wednesday, July 2, 2014

Land Mines: The Political Class Risks Soldiers’ Lives to Feel Good

The sort of “human rights advocates” were always ready to impose an obligation on the civilized West, and always ready to make excuses for the barbarous East, have long been agitating for the elimination of land mines. You may remember it was a favorite cause of that well-born but empty-headed blonde twit, Princess Diana, the Paris Hilton of her day, famous for being famous, and well informed about nothing whatsoever.

2 comments:

Paul X said...

I must say I'm a little doubtful of the "we use mines right" line in this article. However much that may be true, the US government still causes vast amounts of unnecessary death and mayhem through its wars; so the quibbling about mines is a bit silly. If the aim is to save soldiers' lives, a good start would be to stop invading other countries.

Anonymous said...

Interesting that sparky is all butt hurt about banning PERSISTANT land mines, but won't tell you that 50% of all the AP "sleeper" mines ever employed are still in the ground and that 98% of the people killed or wounded by them are civilians-mostly small children and most are killed or wounded decades after the war ended. But hell that's OK ; they're just zipperheads right sparky?